I Am a Strange Loop [Douglas R. Hofstadter] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. One of our greatest philosophers and scientists of the mind. Editorial Reviews. Review. Amazon Best Books of the Month, March : I Am a Strange Loop eBook: Douglas R. Hofstadter: Kindle Store. Scott O’Reilly loops the loop with Douglas Hofstadter.
|Published (Last):||1 May 2017|
|PDF File Size:||8.72 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Instead, there are just a bunch of competing desires that he says, using one of his many analogies, compete in the brain for votes, and the one with the most votes gets to see that desire translated into action. Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link. Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews.
I have long been interested in the nature and origin or human consciousness and sense of self, and as an irreligious materialist, the traditional explanations offered by our dominant social doglas were unsatisfactory.
I Am a Strange Loop
Withoutabox Submit to Film Festivals. Set up a giveaway. It’s clear that he was deeply moved not only by the death of his wife, for which reason he would naturally be inclined to believe, like R. If it cannot, then how can you or I be here?
This is an oversimplification. I would suggest that with careful work, he could learn to observe both universes in his own life and experience.
It was created when Hofstadter said it and someone else heard it. It’s not at all clear to me that this book has any genuine insights to offer, but that may be that it is lost on me as I find his writing style clear, but amateurish His conclusions are irrelevant because they operate within a field of study separate from the one in question. An Eternal Golden Braid.
I Am a Strange Loop: Douglas R. Hofstadter: : Books
This, I think, is what he meant to illustrate with his insistence that some animals don’t have “souls” or “interiority. Or do they act as if they could decide that the local taqueria is a better choice? See all reviews.
Hofstadter subscribes to the concept known as the narrative self: The “I” concept is just something wm seems to be uniquely developed in “higher” animals, so it’s a convenient standard to take up as a measure of worth, because we as humans are sure to come out on top. Is it the same person or a new Self?
So why wouldn’t you?! Along the way we learned th I agree. He supposes that our own personal-identities form slowly as we proceed from infant to child based on all the various influences that impinge on us from the world as these come to influence new effects in our own minds. But to the individual who is teleported, the experience is not continuous. An apparently key part of this book is an insert or annex that provides a number of color photographs illustrating the feedback loop concept Hofstadter is discussing.
I can see it, and believe it. English Choose a language for shopping. The workings of the human brain are described metaphorically and not physiologicallyand often those metaphors are mathematical.
As an exploration of the sense of “I”, Hofstadter explores his own life, and those to whom he has been close.
Nonetheless, an interesting read, though sometimes a bit too “cutesy” for my taste. In other words, the representational power of the strang system described in Principia Mathematica is merely the condition of the possibility of the emergence of a strange loop, not its cause.
It was shared by Ancient Greek philosophers, pre-industrial tribal groups, perhaps some Shinto sects, and St.
I Am a Strange Loop by Douglas R. Hofstadter
See and discover other items: But then again, he is a parochial computer scientist. When he’s talking about how ideas might be represented by patterns in the brain, I’m on board, But then he keeps mixing in some pretty unconvincing bits about why humans are in a completely different class in symbolic understanding according to his definition of “symbol” as, basically, an idea in the brain.
And while perhaps some will find the long and length discursions into Hofstadter’s personal life such as the early death of his wife due to cancer to be enlightening, I don’t see that they really add anything to the objective of the book.
I had a lot of issues with the structure of the argument, which was too dependent on the analogy. Our concepts are built up this way: In this way, one could embed statements about statements into the system, not just statements about numbers, because statements about numbers could also be statements about numbers that were standing in for other statements.
His grasp of the philosophical arguments is lacking, and he spends most of a chapter refuting thought experiments with the laws of physics. This idea seems to be implicit at this point, but I couldn’t find it stated directly.