Heidegger is now widely recognized as one of the most influential and controversial philosophers of the twentieth century, yet much of his later philosophy. Cambridge University Press X – Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education Iain D. Thomson Excerpt More information. Download Citation on ResearchGate | Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education | Heidegger is now widely recognized as one of the .
|Published (Last):||27 November 2018|
|PDF File Size:||14.96 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.46 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Lists with This Book. Beth added it Dec 27, This profoundly troubling com- bination has spawned a secondary literature of singular immensity.
On the problem of onntotheology a theory across epochs, Thomson thinks that Heidegger came to recognize that “there is no substantive, transhistorically binding fundamental ontology” and eventually thought better of his early pretensions to understand the meaning of being in general in favor of his later doctrine of “ontological historicity.
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Restoring Heidegger’s understanding of metaphysics as ‘ontotheology’ to its rightful place at the center of his later thought, this book demonstrates the depth and significance of his controversial critique of technology, his appalling misadventure with Nazism, his prescient critique of the university, and his important philosophical suggestions for the future of higher education.
Dylan rated it really liked it Apr 03, History of Western Philosophy. Iain Thomson University of New Mexico. In any case, Thomson elaborates how Heidegger deconstructs these double groundings into various epochal constellations of intelligibility, a line of succession that supposedly ceases with Nietzsche politicw “ironically” both implodes and completes the metaphysical project. Reflecting the long-standing dispute about the content of Arisotle’s MetaphysicsScotus begins his educahion on the book with the question: Several chapters in particular serve as clear, excellent resources with regards to ontotheology and how Heidegger’s cr An elegant analysis of an oft-neglected subject.
In Chapter 4 the book’s final chapter he taps Heidegger’s discussion of Plato’s conception of paideia for the potential to resolve the current pedagogical crisis. David Lewin – – Studies in Philosophy and Education 35 3: Moreover, the primordial historicality of Dasein affirmed in Being and Time seems plainly at odds with the pretensions of transhistoricality that Thomson attributes to fundamental ontology Chris is currently reading it Apr 09, It would also reinforce his contention that the later Heidegger would have refined but retained the basic structure of the Rectorial Address and that he mistakenly follows Nietzsche’s strategy of combating fragmentation by rejecting academic freedom.
The key, he suggests, lies in the supposed way that “Heidegger’s mature reontologization of education” would combine ideals advocated by Fichte and Humboldt: We need to fix heivegger universities, but by being mindful of Heidegger’s mistakes. Enter ;olitics email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link.
Hunter marked it as to-read Nov 04, Heidegger is now widely recognized as one of the most influential and controversial philosophers of the twentieth century, yet much of his later philosophy remains shrouded in confusion and controversy. Cody rated it it was amazing Jun 10, However, given the tradition of the Aristotelian problem, poliyics it is true in some sense that Heidegger “clarified only slowly” his own understanding of ontotheology 13n. Nietzchean philosophy, however, marks the point where the whole thing derails and becomes the right-to-power.
Open Preview See a Problem?
Iain Thomson, Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education – PhilPapers
That being said, rarely is it elucidated as precisely and depicted in such detail as here. In an attempt to understand both ppolitics connection of Heidegger’s philosophy to his championing of Hitler’s party and the lessons, if any, that he learned from this “political mistake” technooogy he called itThomson turns to Technollogy vision of the university, early and late.
Heidegger’s thinking after Nietzsche is accordingly an attempt to deconstruct metaphysics historically “in order to call its necessity into question, as a first step to understanding things differently” Thomson – – Cambridge University Press. Robbins – – Heythrop Journal 43 2: This chapter and, more broadly, this book can be understood in part as a response to pilitics rather glaring exegetical lacuna. Heidegger is now widely recognized as one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century, yet much of his later philosophy remains shrouded in confusion and controversy.
What Feenberg finds objectionable in Heidegger’s thinking on technology is its supposed ahistoricism reified abstraction from concrete social, historical contextsubstantivism a fetishistic fatalismand one-dimensionalism a monolithic conception.
Trivia About Heidegger on Onto